Drawing for MERRY JANE

USPTO serial 87953883

MERRY JANE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRIEDMAN, LESLEE ANN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MERRY JANE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas Zeigler

Thomas Zeigler AlvaradoSmith1 MacArthur PlaceSuite 200Santa Ana, CA 92707

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Bar soap; Bath soaps; Bath soaps in liquid, solid or gel form; Beauty soap; Cosmetic soaps; Liquid bath soaps; Non-medicated bath soaps in liquid, solid or gel form; Skin soap; all of the aforementioned goods that contain hemp use hemp with no more than a 0.3 percent THC on a dry-weight basisACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 12, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 12, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 10, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 10, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 10, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 15, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 26, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 13, 2021PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 6, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 23, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 23, 2021XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2021GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2021GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2021CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 12, 2021ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 6, 2021PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Mar 20, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 20, 2021XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2021GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2021GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2021CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 2, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 6, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 5, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 6, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 13, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 12, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 22, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 22, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 25, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 14, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance