Drawing for CHIEFWAY

USPTO serial 87955692

CHIEFWAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GULIANO, ROBERT N
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CHIEFWAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Battery chargers; Capacitive styluses for touch screen devices; Cases adapted for computers; Cell phones; Computer peripheral devices; Converters; Electric navigational instruments; Electrical plugs and sockets; Electrical cables; Fitted plastic films known as skins for covering and providing a scratch proof barrier or protection for electronic devices, namely, MP3 players, mobile telephones, smart telephones, digital cameras, global positioning systems and personal digital assistants; PC tablets; Protective films adapted for computer screens; Protective films adapted for smartphones; Smart watches; Solar batteries; Stands adapted for mobile phones; USB cables; Wireless computer peripherals; Wireless headsets for smartphones; Wireless chargers; Wires, electric; Eyeglasses; Headphones; Keyboards; Transmitters of electronic signalsACTIVEJan 19, 2018

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 10, 2019MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Dec 10, 2019ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
May 29, 2019RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
May 29, 2019RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
May 29, 2019RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
May 17, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 17, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2019RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Apr 17, 2019RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2019RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Mar 28, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 21, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2019RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Jan 31, 2019RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2019RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Jan 11, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 6, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 6, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 15, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 1, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 15, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance