USPTO serial 87958992
BOTCON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RATCLIFFE, ROBERT L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOTCON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erin S. Hennessy
ERIN S HENNESSY BRACEWELL LLP701 FIFTH AVENUESUITE 6200SEATTLE, WA 98104Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toys, namely, toy action figures, toy figures, and plush toys; memorabilia, namely, toy action figures related to robots, and modeled toy figurines; collectible toy figures | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Arranging and conducting tradeshows in the field of robot toys | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Organizing and conducting conferences and conventions in the field of robot toys for entertainment purposes; providing a website featuring news and entertainment information about robot toy shows | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2020 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 9, 2020 | EXDD | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 13, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 13, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 11, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |