Drawing for TAEKION

USPTO serial 87959257

TAEKION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AIKENS, RONALD E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TAEKION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott Sanderson

Scott Sanderson Sanderson IP Law, Ltd.665 Milwaukee StreetDenver, CO 80206UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a service for generating cryptocurrency tokens that represent ownership of an investment security; software as a service for software for trading, clearing, and settlement and handling of financial securities, for the operation of financial marketplaceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 25, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 25, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 26, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 29, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 9, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 5, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 5, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 3, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 31, 2018TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Jul 31, 2018PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2018TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Jun 21, 2018PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance