USPTO serial 87959427
ZENDAYA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZENDAYA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tracy Wells
Tracy Wells WELLS LAW1875 Century Park East, Sutie 930Los Angeles, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Abrasive sponges for scrubbing the skin; Combs; Cosmetic brushes; Cosmetic spatulas; Electric face cleansing brushes; Exfoliating slippers; Eyebrow brushes; Eyelash brushes; Shaving brushes; Facial cleansing sponges; Manual cosmetic cleaners, namely, non-woven fabric wipes and sponges; Fitted vanity cases; Hair brushes; Hair tinting brushes; Hair, nail and tooth brushes; Hot air hair brushes; Make-up brushes; Make-up removing appliances; Microdermabrasion sponges for cosmetic use; Non-woven fabric cosmetic wipes; Powder compacts; Powder puffs; Scrub sponges; Sponges used for applying make-up; Droppers sold empty for cosmetic purposes; Electric combs; Hair combs; Cleaning combs; Eyelash combs; Large-toothed combs for the hair; Electric hair combs; Electric hot combs; Electric make-up removing appliances; Electric hot brushes; Non-electric hair straightening combs; Applicator wands for applying make-up to eyes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KZC Entertainment, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ELEVEN SIXTY-TWO BRANDS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ELEVEN SIXTY-TWO BRANDS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named ZENDAYA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 24, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2022 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2021 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 11, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 10, 2021 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2021 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2021 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 31, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2020 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2020 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 10, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 16, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2019 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |