Drawing for FLI CHARGE

USPTO serial 87960158

FLI CHARGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DYER, ERIN ZASKODA
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLI CHARGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Angela Alvarez Sujek

Angela Alvarez Sujek HONIGMAN LLP39400 Woodward Avenue, Suite 101Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304-5151UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Design and development of software, firmware, and hardware in the field of charging rechargeable equipment and powering electronic and electrical equipment; consulting services in the field of design and implementation of software, firmware, and hardware systems for others in the field of charging rechargeable equipment and powering electronic and electrical equipment; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software, firmware, and hardware problems in the field of charging rechargeable equipment and powering electronic and electrical equipmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 7, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 7, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 21, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 10, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2021EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 8, 2021EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 8, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 11, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2020EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2020EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 9, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 27, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 25, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 25, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 21, 2020NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2020DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 19, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 22, 2020DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2020ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 20, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 21, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 2, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 7, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 7, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 17, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 27, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 21, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 21, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 30, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 11, 2018AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 22, 2018PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance