USPTO serial 87961136
OYO ROOMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OYO ROOMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy Cohen Heller
AMY COHEN HELLER LAW OFFICE OF AMY COHEN HELLER, LLCP.O. BOX 1065DEERFIELD, IL 60015UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising services; providing of platform for online market and e-commerce; publicity, promotional and advertising activities via electronic print media in relation to hotel and restaurant services; event marketing services; providing of advertising for marketing and sales promotion | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Travel, tours and transportation services; packaging and storage of goods; online bookings of tours and travel; facilitating or aggregating tours and travel services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, hosting online web facilities for others; software services in the field of hotel management and booking; services of providing computer website and downloadable software that offer intermediation between those who seek and those who offer temporary accommodations, tourism and travel; providing a website on which users can post ratings, reviews and recommendations on events and activities in the field of hospitality; Architectural design for exterior decoration | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Services for providing food and drinks; temporary accommodations; booking of hotels and other facilities for temporary accommodation; restaurant and bar services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Oravel Stays Singapore Pte. Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named OYO ROOMS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |