USPTO serial 87975011
GREENWICH BIOSCIENCES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GREENWICH BIOSCIENCES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Histon, Cambridge, GB
Histon, Cambridge, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anessa Owen Kramer
Anessa Owen Kramer Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP39400 Woodward Avenue, Suite 101Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304-5151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Medical services, not including dermatology, dermatologic surgery and cosmetic surgery; veterinary services; medical analysis services, namely, medical analysis of neuropathic pain, cancer pain, peri-operative pain, oncology, cancer symptoms, multiple sclerosis, spasticity, MS spasticity, convulsions, seizures, epilepsy, paediatric epilepsy, intractable childhood epilepsy with generalized tonic-clonic seizures (ICE-GTC), generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+), dup 15, and Doose syndrome, bladder disfunction, inflammatory bowel disease, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, Alzheimer's, Dravet syndrome, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), spinal cord injury, head injury, bone disorders, chromosome disorders, inflammatory disorders, inflammation, arthritis, metabolic disorders, oncology, cancer symptoms, neurodegenerative diseases, diseases of the central nervous system, peripheral neuropathy, neurogenic symptoms, hypoxicischemic encephalopathy, neonatal hypoxic encephalopathy, stroke, motion sickness and chemically induced sickness, diabetes, type II diabetes, obesity, obesity associated with diabetes, bulimia, psychiatric disorders, schizophrenia, and drug, alcohol and nicotine abuse and autism; horticultural services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 17, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 17, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2018 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 24, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2018 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 23, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 14, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 14, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 29, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 19, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 30, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 5, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2016 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |