USPTO serial 87975051
E
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRYE, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with E?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen J Strauss
STEPHEN J STRAUSS BUCHALTER1000 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 1500LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-1730Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF MOTION PICTURES AND TELEVISION SHOWS; FILM MAKING, NAMELY, FILM STUDIOS, CREATING AND DEVELOPING CONCEPTS FOR MOTION PICTURES AND TELEVISION PROGRAMS | ABANDONED | Jul 13, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2018 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 25, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |