Drawing for VALEO

USPTO serial 87975779

VALEO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LE, KHANH M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VALEO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jason Mueller

Jason Mueller Adams and Reese LLP701 Poydras Street, Suite 4500New Orleans, LA 70139UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Hard hats; bump caps; safety goggles; face-protection shields; dust masks; respirators other than for artificial respiration; protective face masks not for medical purposes; protective work gloves; protective gloves for industrial use; gloves for protection against accidents; protective arm sleeves for protection against accidents; supports for wrists, elbows, backs, and ankles for protection against injury and for use by workers; knee pads for workers; reflective clothing for safety purposes; reflective safety vests; protective vests for cooling to prevent injury due to overheating; protective industrial footwear; protective clothing for protection against accidents for industrial use; eyewear, namely, safety glassesACTIVE—
011Heating packs filled with chemical substances that react when required to warm the body not for medical useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 2, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 30, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 30, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 7, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 5, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 5, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 4, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 26, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 5, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 15, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 6, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 5, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 3, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 21, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 21, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 21, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 31, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 30, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 17, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance