Drawing for KAI KONNECT

USPTO serial 87976072

KAI KONNECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FERRER PEREZ, PAUL ANTHONY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KAI KONNECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Max Vilenchik

Max Vilenchik Max Vilenchik, Esq., PLLC575 Madison Avenue, 10th FloorNew York, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Providing on-line art exhibitions; providing a website featuring entertainment information in the field(s) of art; Providing a website featuring information about artistic styles; Providing a website featuring information in the field of art, art history, art culture and art appreciationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 14, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 14, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 13, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 11, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 11, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 11, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 12, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 10, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 10, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 10, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 12, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 17, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 28, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 21, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 6, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 6, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 29, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 31, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 31, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 9, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 18, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 17, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 26, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 30, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 19, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2017MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance