Drawing for INTELLICLOUD

USPTO serial 87978199

INTELLICLOUD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINSON, JENNIFER ELLE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTELLICLOUD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

A. Reagan Fibbe

ROBIN LIGHTNER MAISASHVILI FIBBE LIGHTNER LLP3733-1 WESTHEIMER RD NO 1009HOUSTON, TX 77027UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consulting in the field of big data analyticsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 1, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 1, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 15, 2019EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 26, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 11, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 2, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 2, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 14, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 3, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 3, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 3, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 2, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 2, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 2, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 2, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 28, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 27, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 26, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 4, 2017MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance