USPTO serial 87978790
NOCISCORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 13, 2018
- Examiner
- GARCIA, CLAUDIA
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with NOCISCORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN MATEO, CA
Redwood City, CA
Redwood City, CA
Redwood City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory B. Phillips
Gregory B. Phillips KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON AND BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN STREET, 14TH FLOORIRVINE, CA 92614United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for use in processing data in connection with diagnostic information based on data collected by magnetic resonance devices including magnetic resonant imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS); Software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for use in creating reports in connection with diagnostic information based on data collected by magnetic resonance devices including magnetic resonant imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS); Software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for use in processing data in connection with diagnostic information based on data collected regarding pain and degenerative or inflammatory tissue conditions; Specialized score feature offered as part of a software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for use in tracking magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) results and creating reports in connection with diagnostic information based on data collected from magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) results regarding pain and degenerative or inflammatory tissue conditions | ACTIVE | Sep 7, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ACLARION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NociMed, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by NociMed, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by NociMed, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NOCISCORE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 11, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 11, 2024 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 11, 2018 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 20, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 23, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 3, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 19, 2017 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 19, 2017 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 19, 2017 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 25, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |