Drawing for SKINBOSS

USPTO serial 87979493

SKINBOSS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SKINBOSS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Computerized online ordering services featuring cosmetics; retail and on-line store services featuring curated cosmetics; on-line retail store services featuring cosmetics and beauty supplies; on-line retail store services featuring cosmetics, personal hygiene and care products; retail store services featuring cosmetics and beauty and personal hygiene productsABANDONEDAug 5, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2025ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 21, 2025OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 20, 2025OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jan 7, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 31, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 12, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2017OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 23, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 2, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 2, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 12, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 30, 2016GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 30, 2016GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 30, 2016CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 23, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 23, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 16, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance