USPTO serial 87980101
Serial No. 87980101
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 13, 2019
- Examiner
- SNABB, SANDRA MARIE
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with Serial No. 87980101?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew J. Smith
Matthew J. Smith Polsinelli PCPO Box 140310Kansas City, MO 64114-0310United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Blank cards, namely, notecards | ACTIVE | Jun 19, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 28, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 13, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 9, 2019 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2019 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2019 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 6, 2019 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 14, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 14, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 13, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 21, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |