USPTO serial 87980211
PRECISION MILLING SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5796207Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 2, 2019
- Examiner
- BESCH, JAY C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PRECISION MILLING SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael E. Dukes
MICHAEL E. DUKES COHEN & GRIGSBY, P.C.625 LIBERTY AVENUEPITTSBURGH, PA 15222-3152UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electrical ultrasonic cleaning units for laboratory equipment; vibratory feeders for laboratory samples | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 2018 |
| 009 | Laboratory mills and grinders, namely, planetary mills, ball mills, cutting mills, knife mills, rotor mills, beater mills, jaw crushers, disk mills, mortar grinders; laboratory equipment, namely, sieve shakers, sample dividers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fritsch Milling & Sizing, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Fritsch Milling & Sizing, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PRECISION MILLING SYSTEMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2026 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 2, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 29, 2019 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 24, 2019 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2019 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2019 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 21, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 6, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 12, 2019 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 12, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 9, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |