Drawing for X XACTLY

USPTO serial 87980235

X XACTLY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SCHLEGELMILCH, JONATHON A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with X XACTLY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Herbert W. Larson

HERBERT W. LARSON LARSON & LARSON, P.A.11199 69TH STLARGO, FL 33773UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009CARRYING CASES, HOLDERS, PROTECTIVE CASES AND STANDS FEATURING POWER SUPPLY CONNECTORS, ADAPTORS, SPEAKERS AND BATTERY CHARGING DEVICES, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR USE WITH HANDHELD DIGITAL ELECTRONIC DEVICES, NAMELY, CELL PHONES AND TABLET COMPUTERS; CELL PHONE BATTERY CHARGERS; CELL PHONE BATTERY CHARGERS FOR USE IN VEHICLES; EARBUDS; ELECTRONIC HUBS FOR CONNECTING CELL PHONES; PORTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES FOR RECORDING DATA, ORGANIZING DATA, AND TRANSMITTING DATA, AND TABLET COMPUTERS IN AN AUTOMOBILE; HEADPHONES; KEYBOARDS; WIRELESS CHARGERS; WIRELESS SPEAKERSACTIVE—
021BEVERAGE GLASSWARE; COCKTAIL GLASSES; COCKTAIL SHAKERS; DRINKWARE; MUGS; NON-ELECTRIC PORTABLE COOLERS; REUSABLE PLASTIC WATER BOTTLES SOLD EMPTY; REUSABLE STAINLESS STEEL WATER BOTTLES SOLD EMPTY; SHAKER BOTTLES SOLD EMPTY; TUMBLERS FOR USE AS DRINKING GLASSESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 18, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 18, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 6, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 6, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 6, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 30, 2019MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 26, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 27, 2019DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2019ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 25, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 31, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2018LOPRLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN—
Jul 25, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 21, 2018LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Apr 17, 2018MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance