USPTO serial 87980235
X XACTLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHLEGELMILCH, JONATHON A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with X XACTLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert W. Larson
HERBERT W. LARSON LARSON & LARSON, P.A.11199 69TH STLARGO, FL 33773UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CARRYING CASES, HOLDERS, PROTECTIVE CASES AND STANDS FEATURING POWER SUPPLY CONNECTORS, ADAPTORS, SPEAKERS AND BATTERY CHARGING DEVICES, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR USE WITH HANDHELD DIGITAL ELECTRONIC DEVICES, NAMELY, CELL PHONES AND TABLET COMPUTERS; CELL PHONE BATTERY CHARGERS; CELL PHONE BATTERY CHARGERS FOR USE IN VEHICLES; EARBUDS; ELECTRONIC HUBS FOR CONNECTING CELL PHONES; PORTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES FOR RECORDING DATA, ORGANIZING DATA, AND TRANSMITTING DATA, AND TABLET COMPUTERS IN AN AUTOMOBILE; HEADPHONES; KEYBOARDS; WIRELESS CHARGERS; WIRELESS SPEAKERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | BEVERAGE GLASSWARE; COCKTAIL GLASSES; COCKTAIL SHAKERS; DRINKWARE; MUGS; NON-ELECTRIC PORTABLE COOLERS; REUSABLE PLASTIC WATER BOTTLES SOLD EMPTY; REUSABLE STAINLESS STEEL WATER BOTTLES SOLD EMPTY; SHAKER BOTTLES SOLD EMPTY; TUMBLERS FOR USE AS DRINKING GLASSES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 6, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 30, 2019 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2018 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2018 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |