Drawing for GOODGAMES

USPTO serial 87981000

GOODGAMES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5814812Status 702Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 23, 2019
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.

Status 702: Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use.

Need help with GOODGAMES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marc N. Blumenthal

Marc N. Blumenthal LAW OFFICE OF MARC N. BLUMENTHAL8950 Lincolnwood Dr.Evanston, IL 60203United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035On-line retail store services featuring games, game accessories boxes and decks; Retail outlets featuring board games, role playing games, war games using model soldiers, card games to be played on the premises, and sold to customers, as well as tournaments conducted on the premises for different forms of gamesACTIVEAug 15, 2007
041Organizing, conducting and operating board games, card games and other forms of competitive tournament; entertainment in the nature of board game, role playing game and card game tournaments conducted at retail outletsACTIVEAug 17, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2025NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 8, 2025C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 7, 2025EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2025PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Apr 24, 2025PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Apr 3, 2025PRANPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED—
Jan 27, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 9, 2024E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2024REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 27, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2019A7OKAMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Oct 25, 2019EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2019EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2019EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2019PRAMPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7—
Sep 18, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 29, 2019ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 15, 2019SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2019CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
May 25, 2019MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
May 24, 2019SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 24, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 21, 2019IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
May 21, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 21, 2019INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
May 17, 2019IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 17, 2019DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 17, 2019ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
May 17, 2019EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 16, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 15, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 4, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 4, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 7, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 5, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 5, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 9, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 28, 2017TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Nov 28, 2017OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 28, 2017OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Apr 5, 2017OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 6, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 16, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 15, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 7, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 27, 2016MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
May 26, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 24, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance