USPTO serial 87982314
LEADING THE CREATIVE VIDEO REVOLUTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 18, 2020
- Examiner
- CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with LEADING THE CREATIVE VIDEO REVOLUTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Caroline H. Mead
Caroline H. Mead Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP555 California Street, Suite 550San Francisco, CA 94104United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Use in Commerce) computer hardware, audio visual equipment, apparatus and accessories, namely, PCI and PCIe video capture cards for computers, video cards, digital to analogue converters, analogue to digital converters, video processing devices, video mixing devices, real time converting devices, audio visual equipment for use in recording, implementing the connectivity, processing, editing, conversion, transmission, reproduction and monitoring of audio, images and video; apparatus and instruments for capturing, scanning, storing, displaying, converting, processing, manipulating, retrieving, transmitting and receiving motion picture film and video or image data signals; optical lenses; digital still, video and motion-picture cameras; (Based on 44(e)) computer hardware inclusive of video cards; computer software for operating video cards and/or for video editing; computer software for the transmission of video and images over computer networks including global computer networks and the world wide web; audio visual equipment, apparatus and accessories including electronic audio visual equipment, apparatus and accessories, namely, cameras, sound and video recording and playback machines, video monitors, audio monitors, digital film scanners, converters, encoders; computer software for audio visual applications, namely, software for capturing, editing, duplicating, converting, storing and broadcasting and routing images, sound and video and controlling and processing software for audio visual apparatus | ACTIVE | Apr 4, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Blackmagic Design Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Blackmagic Design Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Blackmagic Design Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named LEADING THE CREATIVE VIDEO REVOLUTION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2026 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2026 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 16, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 16, 2020 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2020 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 5, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 9, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 14, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 27, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |