USPTO serial 87982812
SKINNYDIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 11, 2020
- Examiner
- AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SKINNYDIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*
Plus Government fees of $1,275
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sean K. Owens
SEAN K. OWENS WOOD HERRON & EVANS LLPTheodore R. Remaklus, Kathryn E. Smith,441 VINE STREET 2700 CAREW TOWERCINCINNATI, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Hand-operated hand tools and implements, namely, hammers, wrenches, files; manicure sets; pedicure sets; hand- operated tools, instruments and implements, all for manicure, pedicure or for care of the body or hair, namely, nail files, nail clippers, cuticle pushers, tweezers, nail and cuticle scissors, nail skin treatment trimmers; Hair clippers for personal use, electric and non-electric; nail files; scissors; nail clippers; cuticle nippers; nail polishers; nail buffers; nail scissors; hand-operated nail extractors; cases for manicure or pedicure instruments; electric hair straighteners; emery boards | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Furniture; mirrors; personal compact mirrors; make-up mirrors; pillows; cushions; packaging containers of plastic, wood, cork or shell; point of sale displays, namely, display units; display cases and racks for cosmetics, skin care products, beauty care products and nail care products | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Household and kitchen utensils, namely, spatulas, splatter screens, kitchen tongs, pouring and straining spouts; kitchen containers; back scratchers; atomizers for household use; soap dishes; toothbrush holders; incense burners, incense stick holders; potpourri holders; beverage glassware; decorative centerpieces of porcelain; Ceramic sculptures, vases, vessels, bowls, plates and pots; earthenware mugs; Baskets for household purposes, not of metal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Skinnydip Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Skinnydip Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Skinnydip Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named SKINNYDIP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 26, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 6, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2020 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 6, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 12, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 9, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |