USPTO serial 87983069
STONEY CREEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 23, 2020
- Examiner
- CALIENDO, COURTNEY MICHELLE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with STONEY CREEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $425
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CONYERS, GA
Conyers, GA
Conyers, GA
Conyers, GA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Bootcheck
Michael J. Bootcheck MICHAEL J. BOOTCHECK, LLC861 COMMERCE DR. SWCONYERS, GA 30094UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Poultry; chicken; luncheon meats; ready-to-eat, frozen and prepared meals consisting primarily of meat or poultry; processed frozen potatoes; frozen French fries; potato crisps and chips; potato-based snack foods; meat, fish, poultry and game, not live; meat extracts; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs; milk; milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; edible oils and fats; processed peanuts; processed nuts; seafood, not live; hot dogs; cheese; frozen appetizers consisting primarily of chicken or seafood | ACTIVE | Apr 25, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NIELSEN HOLDINGS GROUP, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Nielsen Ventures LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Nielsen Ventures LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Nielsen Ventures LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named STONEY CREEK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 21, 2020 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2020 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2020 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 29, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 10, 2020 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2019 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 17, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 11, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 10, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 14, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2019 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 13, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 12, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 10, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 13, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |