USPTO serial 87983406
BUDS & ROSES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DANTZLER, LAUREN ALEXANDRIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BUDS & ROSES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NATHANIEL L FINTZ
NATHANIEL L FINTZ ZUBER LAWLER LLPONE PENN PLAZA, SUITE 4430NEW YORK, NY 10119UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others, not including marijuana and marijuana-related substances, all of the foregoing containing CBD derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis; Retail store services featuring smoking products, medicinal herbs and herbs for medical purposes, all of the foregoing not including marijuana and marijuana-related substances, all of the foregoing containing CBD derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis; Retail convenience stores, not including marijuana and marijuana-related substances, all of the foregoing containing CBD derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis; Retail variety stores, not including marijuana and marijuana-related substances, all of the foregoing containing CBD derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis; On-line retail store services featuring smoking products, medicinal herbs and herbs for medical purposes, all of the foregoing not including marijuana and marijuana-related substances, all of the foregoing containing CBD derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis; On-line retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others, not including marijuana and marijuana-related substances, all of the foregoing containing CBD derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2021 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 23, 2021 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 12, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 23, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 13, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 13, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 7, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 28, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 24, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2020 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |