Drawing for MIXER

USPTO serial 87983609

MIXER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SWIFT, GILBERT M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MIXER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Allisen Pawlenty

Allisen Pawlenty Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP607 14th Street, NW, Suite 900Washington, DC 20005-2018UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041multimedia publishing of game softwareACTIVEJun 22, 2020
042providing cloud computing services, namely, cloud hosting provider services and cloud computing featuring software for broadcasting, transmitting, receiving, accessing, viewing, sharing, displaying, storing, and streaming of data, games, game content, digital media, images, music, audio, video and animations in the field of games, video games, and game content; computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider servicesACTIVEJun 22, 2020

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 12, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 12, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 12, 2021ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 15, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2021CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 24, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2020SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 23, 2020DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 23, 2020EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 3, 2020IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 4, 2020INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Aug 28, 2020IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 28, 2020DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2020ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2020EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 27, 2020EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 27, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 5, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 21, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 21, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2020EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 2, 2020EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 2, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 28, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 26, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 26, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 19, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2019NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 18, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 18, 2019IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 5, 2019INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Apr 3, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 13, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 13, 2019DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2019ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 29, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 19, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 24, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 14, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 14, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 12, 2018ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 5, 2018PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
May 17, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 4, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 21, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 21, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 21, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 1, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 29, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance