USPTO serial 88000245
GEOSPATIAL COMPETITIVENESS ANALYSIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GEOSPATIAL COMPETITIVENESS ANALYSIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | 1. Geospatial competitiveness analysis (GCA) a. What is GCA: GCA integrates geospatial data with supply chain mapping, value chain and cluster analysis, trade logistics analysis, and agent-based modelling to provide a comprehensive competitiveness diagnostic by accounting for access and connectivity to input supplies and destination markets, human geography and limitations of infrastructure systems. b. How is GCA used: i. Land use and industrial zone planning: Geospatial and logistics analysis for site selection and site suitability assessment; infrastructure design, monitoring, and maintenance; traffic flow design; water and waste management; human geography; and industrial symbiosis. For prospective sites, GCA delivers detailed analytics for optimal site selection that maximizes value creation, while minimizing cost, time to market and socio-environmental impact. For existing sites, GCA provides data-driven solutions on resource management, physical development and policy needed to overcome barriers to competitiveness. ii. Tourism design, monitoring, and maintenance: Crowd flow optimization, circuit planning and maximization of productive assets using geospatial analysis combined with agent-based modelling to assess the socio-economic and environmental impact of increased tourism activity. iii. Disaster assessment and risk management, relief planning and monitoring: Real-time disaster site monitoring and impact forecasting, relief delivery optimization, and recovery plan modelling. iv. Forestry and range management and monitoring: · Range management: Rangeland optimization modelling based on data-driven analytics of ground cover and density, available water resources, livestock density, and climate change. · Forestry: Remote monitoring of tree and plant type, age and density, logging activities and reforestation modelling. v. Agriculture: · Smallholder agriculture: Agro-spatial mapping at national, regional, village, or individual farm level using satellite and drone imaging that offers comprehensive site assessment to define optimal climate-resilient cropping options that maximize available resources based on climate change scenario models. Examples of such options include variable rate fertilizer and chemical application to help farmers reduce costs and environmental impact by minimizing runoff while maintaining yield. · Commercial agriculture: Agro-spatial zone planning using satellite and drone-based imagining for infrastructure design, crop planning to optimize available land and resources, and connectivity to input supply and destination markets. GCA is used for crop monitoring, pest and water management, and yield rate modelling. c. What we do: The GDS team applies its suite of analytical tools and methodologies to analyze, design, and implement a comprehensive GCA tailored for our clients' needs. d. How our clients benefit: Clients receive a customized, prioritized, action-ready roadmap, backed by quantitative analysis and images, that effectively responds to short-, medium- and long-term opportunities for growth and challenges undermining competitiveness. Clients also benefit from a mobilization team that can deliver results on the ground and provide follow up to ensure sustainability | ACTIVE | Jun 13, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |