USPTO serial 88002243
RXB BLOCKCHAIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- IM, JEAN H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RXB BLOCKCHAIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
RXB Healthcare Technologies Ltd.
North Vancouver, BC, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Mobile applications for accessing a private blockchain database of personal health records; Mobile applications for managing and analyzing personal health records stored in a private blockchain database; Mobile applications for assisting specimen collection, tracking and management in the field of healthcare | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for accessing a private blockchain database of personal health records; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for managing and analyzing personal health records stored in a private blockchain database; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for assisting specimen collection, tracking and management in the field of healthcare; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for sharing of personal healthcare records to and among third-party healthcare providers to enable provision of integrated healthcare services from the providers.; Providing a website featuring temporary use of non-downloadable software for accessing a private blockchain database of personal health records; Providing a website featuring temporary use of non-downloadable software for managing and analyzing personal health records stored in a private blockchain database; Providing a website featuring temporary use of non-downloadable software for assisting specimen collection, tracking and management in the field of healthcare; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for accessing a private blockchain database of personal health records; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for managing and analyzing personal health records stored in a private blockchain database; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for assisting specimen collection, tracking and management in the field of healthcare; Providing a secure, web-based service featuring enabling individuals to remotely access, send, receive, store, and manage personal health records; Application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for integrating the manipulation of personal health records into websites and mobile applications | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 044 | Medical information; Providing medical information to individuals on the basis of automated data analysis of personal health records; Providing medical information to individuals on the basis of artificial intelligence (AI)-based data analysis of personal health records; Providing information and advice in the field of specimen collection for medical testing for diagnostic or treatment purposes; Providing information and advice in the field of personal health; Providing personal health information to individuals on the basis of automated data analysis of personal health records; Providing personal health information to individuals on the basis of artificial intelligence (AI)-based data analysis of personal health records | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |