USPTO serial 88007095
CANE BLISS BLACK MARKET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DANTZLER, LAUREN ALEXANDRIA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CANE BLISS BLACK MARKET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KARIN SEGALL
KARIN SEGALL LEASON ELLIS LLPONE BARKER AVENUE FIFTH FLOORWHITE PLAINS, NY 10601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Beauty and beauty supply products, namely, body and beauty care cosmetics, face and body beauty creams; Skin care, namely, cosmetic preparations for skin care; Hair care, namely, hair shampoos, hair conditioners, hair rinses, hair masks, hair oil, hairspray; Body care products, namely, deodorants for body care, lotions for body care; Cosmetics; Toiletries in the nature of non-medicated toiletry preparations; Aesthetic products, namely, cosmetics; Facial products, namely, facial cleansers, facial creams; Waxing products, namely, wax for removing body hair; Make-up; Manicure, pedicure and nail products, namely, cosmetic nail preparations, adhesives for artificial nails; all of the foregoing containing CBD derived from hemp with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2021 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 24, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2021 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 22, 2021 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 19, 2021 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 15, 2021 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 29, 2020 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 25, 2020 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 18, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |