Drawing for Serial No. 88007175

USPTO serial 88007175

Serial No. 88007175

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNABB, SANDRA MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 88007175?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bradley J. Walz

Bradley J. Walz Barnes & Thornburg, LLP225 South Sixth Street, Suite 2800Minneapolis, MN 55402-4662UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Facial recognition system comprising a camera, computer hardware, and computer software featuring artificial intelligence for proof of personACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 31, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 27, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 26, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 11, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 3, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2020TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 2, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 2, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 30, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 30, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 4, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 15, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 15, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 1, 2019PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 30, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 25, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 12, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 28, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 26, 2018MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance