USPTO serial 88009659
MARV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PASSMAN, NICOLE A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MARV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Rochester Hills, MI
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC DEVICES FOR LOCATING AND TRACKING PERSONNEL AND VEHICLES USING RADIO FREQUENCY; ELECTRONIC TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS FOR LOCATION TRACKING; ELECTRIC MONITORING APPARATUS, NAMELY, RADIO WAVE TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS; RADIO WAVE TRANSMITTER AND RECEIVER DEVICES; ELECTRONIC DATA LOGGERS; MEASURING INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, INERTIAL MEASUREMENT UNITS; ELECTRICAL SENSOR CONTROLLERS; POWER AMPLIFIERS; ELECTRONIC DISPLAY INTERFACES | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2018 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |