USPTO serial 88010308
DELISH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIORELLI, JOANNA ELISA-HOLGUI
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DELISH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maureen Sheehan
MAUREEN SHEEHAN HEARST CORPORATION300 WEST 57TH STREETNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | NON-ELECTRIC CAN OPENERS; NON-ELECTRIC FRUIT PEELERS; NON-ELECTRIC VEGETABLE PEELERS; HAND-OPERATED APPLE CORERS; CHEESE PLANES; NON-ELECTRIC PIZZA CUTTERS; MEAT TENDERIZER, NAMELY A KITCHEN MALLET; MANDOLINS FOR CUTTING FOOD; FLATWARE SETS CONSISTING OF FORKS, KNIVES AND SPOONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | KITCHEN TIMERS; MEAT THERMOMETERS; MEASURING CUPS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | HOUSEHOLD UTENSILS, namely, TURNERS; COOKING SPOONS, KITCHEN LADLES; WHISKS; KITCHEN TONGS; ICE CREAM SCOOPS; GARLIC PRESSES; COOKING STRAINERS; KITCHEN UTENSILS NAMELY, SPLATTER SCREENS; FOOD BASTERS; MIXING BOWLS; CUTTING BOARDS; DINNERWARE; DRINKWARE SETS CONSISTING OF RED WINE GLASSES, WHITE WINE GLASSES, STEMLESS WINE GLASSES AND CHAMPAGNE FLUTES; DRINKWARE; PASTRY BRUSHES; ROLLING PINS; HAND-OPERATED PASTRY BLENDERS; COOLING RACKS FOR BAKED GOODS; CAKE PANS; COOKIE SHEETS; PANS FOR BAKING; CAKE DECORATING SETS SOLD AS A UNIT COMPRISED OF TIPS, COUPLERS, TUBE CLEANING BRUSHES, PASTRY BAGS AND SPATULAS; SCOOPS FOR SERVING OR PORTIONING COOKIE DOUGH; DESSERT SERVERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 4, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |