USPTO serial 88015759
XXTEND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDSON, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with XXTEND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Saint James, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Olivia M. Clavio
OLIVIA M. CLAVIO BARNES & THORNBURG LLP11 SOUTH MERIDIAN STREETINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-3535UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | hairdressing appliances; hair dryers; hair dryer diffusers; hair drying machines for beauty salon use; hair dye; hair relaxers; hair lighteners; hair texturizers; hair frosts; hair wax; hair colorants; hair sprays; hair lotion; hair bleach; hair tonics; hair oils; hair nourishers; hair lacquers; hair gels; hair fixers; hair decolorants; hair balsam; hair masks; hair mascara; hair mousse; hair shampoo; hair rinses; hair conditioners; hair glaze; hair emollients; hair color; hair butter; hair pomades; hair glitter; hair piece bonding glue; hair-washing powder; oils for hair conditioning; styling foam for hair; hair detangling preparations; adhesives for affixing false hair; cosmetic hair regrowth inhibiting preparations; medicated hair serums; medicated hair care preparations; hair growth stimulants; electric hair straightener; electric hair crimper; electric hair trimmers; electric hair clippers; hair cutting scissors; non-electric hair clippers; hair-removing tweezers; hand-operated hair clippers; electric hair curling irons; electrolysis apparatus for hair removal; bags and cases specially adapted for holding or carrying hair cutting scissors and shears; blades for electric razors; depilation appliances, electric and non-electric; curling tongs; crimping irons; flat irons; hair brushes; hair picks; hair combs; hot hair brushes; electrically heated hair brushes; hair tinting bowls; hair color application bottles; caddies for holding hair accessories for household and domestic use; hair weaves; hair elastics; hair netting; hair ribbons; hair grips; false hair; hair slides; hair rods; hair clamps; hair chopsticks; hair extensions; hair pieces; hair buckles; hair bows; hair pins; hair nets; hair bands; hair clips; hair barrettes; hair scrunchies; hair frosting caps; hair coloring caps; hair coloring foils; non-electric hair rollers; clam clips for hair; toupees; hair curl clips; hair curl papers; synthetic braiding hair; human braiding hair; electric hair waving implements; foam hair rollers; hair pieces and wigs; hair ornaments in the nature of hair wraps; waving pins for the hair; cases specially adapted for holding or carrying hair extensions and hair pieces; bridal headpieces in the nature of ornamental hair combs; wigs, hairpieces, and add-in and add-on hair accessories constructed primarily of synthetic and/or human hair; braids | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |