USPTO serial 88018720
SUPERVANK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUPERVANK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander J.A. Garcia
ALEXANDER J.A. GARCIA PERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 4900SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for online content delivery; maintenance of computer software used in the field of e-commerce; management of web sites for electronic commerce for others; computer programming for electronic commerce; hosting computer application software of others in the field of knowledge management for creating searchable databases of information and data; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for database management, use as a spreadsheet and word processing; computer programming services for commercial analysis and reporting; database design and development; electronic storage services for archiving databases, images and other electronic data; development of computer software for data processing; design of computer programs for data processing; maintenance and management of commercial sites, namely, maintenance and hosting of commercial websites for others; providing platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in database management, as a spreadsheet, and word processing; development, updating and maintenance of computer software and database systems; providing information about online computer work platform transmission technology and programming via a web site; design and development of operating system software; designing computer software for controlling self-service terminals; maintenance and consultancy services relating to software used in the field of e-commerce; maintenance of web sites for electronic commerce; developing computer programs for electronic cash register systems; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for use in the creation and publication of on-line journals and blogs; application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software applications of others; development of application software for delivery of multimedia content; crossplatform conversion of digital content into other forms of digital content; constructing an internet platform for electronic commerce, namely, creating electronic commerce websites for others; information retrieval services, namely, retrieving computer files on computer networks for others; weblog services via internet, namely, creating and maintaining weblogs for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 6, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |