USPTO serial 88019435
PRYNTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EBAUGH, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRYNTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CORPEAU, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle P. Ciotola
MICHELLE P. CIOTOLA CANTOR COLBURN LLP20 CHURCH STREETFLOOR 22HARTFORD, CT 06103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Video cameras in the field of video surveillance equipment; robotic video cameras in the field of video surveillance equipment; lenses for video cameras in the field of video surveillance equipment; video camera stands; Management of electronic video surveillance products | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Videotape production; videotape editing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of software for image processing and management of robotic cameras in the field of video surveillance equipment; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in database management, data analysis, data processing, data recording, aggregating and organizing customer data, in the field of video surveillance. Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in receiving, organizing, screening, editing, recording, storing, analyzing, distributing and audiovisual data captured by remote surveillance systems; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for automating, operating, monitoring, and controlling video surveillance systems; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for analyzing audiovisual data captured by remote surveillance systems; cloud computing featuring for use in database management, data analysis, data processing, data recording, aggregating and organizing customer data, in the field of video surveillance; cloud computing featuring software for use in receiving, organizing, screening, editing, recording, storing, analyzing, distributing and audiovisual data captured by remote surveillance systems; cloud computing featuring software for automating, operating, monitoring, and controlling video surveillance systems; cloud computing featuring software for analyzing audiovisual data captured by remote surveillance systems; electronic storage of data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2019 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 18, 2019 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 15, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 23, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |