USPTO serial 88020457
WIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLAZICH, JOAN MICHELE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Saint-Laurent, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janet F. Satterthwaite
Janet F. Satterthwaite POTOMAC LAW GROUP1300 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWSUITE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | kitchen sponges; kitchen sponge refills; cellulose sponges for household purposes; cellulose scrubbing sponges; dish mops; sponge scrubbers in the nature of scrub sponges; scouring pads; scrubbing sponges; dustpans and whisks; scrubbing brushes; toilet brushes; magnetic dusters; magic dusters; microfiber all-purpose cloths for cleaning; microfiber kitchen cloths for cleaning; microfiber glass and mirror cloths for cleaning; all-purpose cleaning cloths; window-washing cloths ; microfiber chenille dusters;brooms with handles; broom heads; microfiber dust mops; microfiber chenille mops; cotton mops with handles; mop heads, broom handles; rubber household gloves, cleaning cloths | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |