USPTO serial 88020512
FROM HUNTED TO HUNTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FROM HUNTED TO HUNTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Castle Rock, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric J. Neeper
ERIC J. NEEPER Minor and Brown650 S Cherry St Ste 1100Denver, CO 80246-1800UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | multi-platform, downloadable computer network security software for managing computer network endpoint security and predicting and monitoring security threats to computer networks using behavioral-based predictive execution modeling | ACTIVE | May 15, 2018 |
| 042 | computer consultation; consulting in the field of information technology; computer consultation in the field of computer and network security; computer security consultancy in the field of scanning and penetration testing of computers and networks to assess information security vulnerability; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring computer network security software for managing computer network endpoint security and predicting and monitoring security threats to computer networks using behavioral-based predictive execution modeling; software as a service (SaaS) services, namely, hosting software for use in detecting, blocking, and removing computer viruses and threats; threat hunting as a service (THaaS) services featuring computer network security software for managing computer network endpoint security and predicting and monitoring security threats to computer networks using behavioral-based predictive execution modeling; threat hunting as a service (THaaS) services, namely, hosting software for use in detecting, blocking, and removing computer viruses and threats; application service provider (ASP) featuring non-downloadable computer software for use in computer and network security; maintenance and updating of computer software relating to computer and network security and prevention of computer risks; computer security consultancy, namely, developing plans for improving computer and network security for businesses and governmental agencies; cloud computing featuring software for use in computer and network security; cloud computing services in the field of computer and network security; computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for creating databases of information and data related to malware and computer and network security; computer services, namely, online scanning, detecting, quarantining, and eliminating viruses, worms, Trojans, spyware, adware, malware and unauthorized data and programs on computers, networks, and electronic devices; computer systems analysis; implementing plans for improving computer and network security and preventing criminal activity for businesses and governmental agencies, namely, identifying malware on computer systems, identifying the source and genealogy of malware, and identifying the objectives of computer system attackers | ACTIVE | May 15, 2018 |
| 045 | monitoring of computer systems for security purposes; provision of systems for the management of computer and network threats, namely, surveillance and monitoring of vulnerability and security problems in computer hardware, networks, and software; implementing plans for improving computer and network security via a global computer network | ACTIVE | May 15, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 12, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |