USPTO serial 88022374
TENDA NOVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VALLILLO, MELISSA C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TENDA NOVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adriano Pacifici
Adriano Pacifici Intellectual Property Consulting, LLC334 Carondelet StreetSuite BNew Orleans, LA 70130Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Antennas; Bar code readers; Cabinets for loudspeakers; Cameras; Cards with integrated circuits; Coaxial cables; Compact disc recorders; Computer game programs; Computer peripheral devices; Computer software for use in database management; Computers; Electric cables; Electric wires; Electronic notice boards; Eyeglasses; GPS navigation device; Headphones; Keyboards; Laptops; Magnetic wires; Magnetically encoded identity cards; Memories for use with computers; Modems; MP3 players; MP4 players; Navigation apparatus for vehicles; Photocopying machines; Power supplies; Punched card machines for offices; Radiotelephony sets; Recorded computer operating programs; Slide projectors; Telephone wires; Theft alarms; Voltage stabilizing power supply; Walkie-talkies; Audio interfaces; Blank smart cards; Computer central processing units; Computer chips; Computer monitors; Computer mouse, namely, touchpads; Data processing equipment, namely, couplers; Document printers for use with computers; Electric navigational instruments; Electronic data processing apparatus; Electronic and optical communications instruments and components, namely, optical transmitters; Electronic anti-theft system comprised of a bar code scanner that allows manufacturers to temporarily disable electronic goods during the manufacturing process and allows retailers to enable such goods upon receiving the purchase price for the goods; Mobile telephones; Network routers; Wireless routers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Shenzhen Tenda Technology Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Shenzhen Tenda Technology Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by DENGPING, QUAN
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named TENDA NOVA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2020 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2019 | INCS | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 14, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 28, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 2, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |