USPTO serial 88022865
A LA CARTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with A LA CARTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter S. Sloane
PETER S. SLOANE LEASON ELLIS LLPONE BARKER AVENUE, 5TH FLOORWHITE PLAINS, NY 10601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Flatware, namely, forks, knives, and spoons; scissors; chef knives; household knives; utility knives; bread knives; hand-operated choppers; cheese slicers, non-electric; pizza cutters, non-electric; non-electric can openers; non-electric fruit and vegetable peelers; hand-operated fruit and vegetable corers; grapefruit trimmer, namely, a kitchen knife with serrated edges; zesters | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Dinnerware; beverage glassware; bakeware; baking utensils, namely, rolling pins, pastry brushes and hand-operated flour sifters for household use; baking dishes; bowls; cooking pots and pans; colanders for household use; strainers; drinkware; servingware for serving food and drink; kitchen utensil crocks; napkin holders; water bottles sold empty; cutting boards; portable beverage dispensers; kitchen containers; household containers for food; plastic storage containers for household use; thermal insulated containers for food or beverage; glass storage jars; bread baskets for household purposes; mugs; potholders; trivets; trays for household purposes; kettles, non-electric; teapots, non-electric; coffeepots, non-electric; coffee scoops; spice racks; hand operated spice grinders; salt and pepper shakers; hand-operated pepper mills; cake and pie servers; jar openers; ice cream scoops; pie servers; bottle openers; garlic presses; turners; spatulas; cooking spoons; food basters; cooking forks; vegetable mashers; whisks; graters; salad spinners; cork screws; cleaning brushes for barbecue grills; utensils for barbecues, namely, forks, tongs, turners; barbeque mitts; dishwashing brushes; dish drying racks; kitchen sponges; soap holders; nut crackers not of precious metal; salad tongs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |