USPTO serial 88026792
AERYON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RONCORONI, LAUREN R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AERYON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WATERLOO, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lorelei G. Graham
LORELEI G. GRAHAM NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT CANADA LLP1 PLACE VILLE MARIE, SUITE 2500MONTREAL, QUEBEC, H3B1R1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software stored on unmanned aerial vehicles, namely, software for controlling the flight of unmanned aerial vehicles, software for interfacing with unmanned aerial vehicle parts and accessories, software controlling the functioning of unmanned aerial vehicle parts and accessories, and software for controlling the functioning of unmanned aerial vehicles; Software stored on unmanned aerial vehicle parts and accessories, namely, software for interfacing between unmanned aerial vehicles and unmanned aerial vehicle parts and accessories, software for controlling the functioning of unmanned aerial vehicles, software for controlling the functioning of unmanned aerial vehicle parts and accessories, and software for communicating with unmanned aerial vehicles; Downloadable software in the nature of mobile applications for controlling and receiving data from unmanned aerial systems; Unmanned aerial vehicles; Unmanned aerial vehicle systems, namely, combinations of unmanned aerial vehicles with unmanned aerial vehicle parts and accessories; Unmanned aerial vehicle parts and accessories, namely, batteries, battery chargers, battery charger power supplies, unmanned aerial vehicle payloads, portable electronic devices to physically or remotely control unmanned aerial vehicles, portable electronic wireless communications signal-relay stations, portable electronic unmanned aerial vehicle recharging stations, and portable electronic stations used to communicate wirelessly with unmanned aerial vehicles; Sales and distribution services for unmanned aerial vehicles, unmanned aerial vehicles parts and components, unmanned aerial vehicle systems and unmanned aerial vehicle software; Technical and engineering services for unmanned aerial vehicles, namely, design, manufacturing, repair, modification, upgrading and customization; Education, training, trouble-shooting and trouble-shooting support services for unmanned aerial vehicles, unmanned aerial vehicle parts and components, unmanned aerial vehicle systems and unmanned aerial vehicle software; Software as a Service (SaaS) and Software as a Platform (SaaP) for interpreting data received from unmanned aerial vehicles or converting such data into a new form; Software as a Service (SaaS) and Software as a Platform (SaaP) for interpreting data received from unmanned aerial vehicle parts and accessories or converting such data into a new form; Software as a Service (SaaS) and Software as a Platform (SaaP) for managing fleets of unmanned aerial systems; Software as a Service (SaaS) and Software as a Platform (SaaP) for remote viewing and distribution of UAS video and data feeds | ACTIVE | Apr 26, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 28, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |