Drawing for NUBY

USPTO serial 88028109

NUBY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAIHOS, JESSIE ANDREA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NUBY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert M. Chiaviello, Jr.

ROBERT M. CHIAVIELLO, JR. NUBY LAW3030 AURORA AVE.MONROE, LA 71201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Baby hand soap; Baby lotion; Baby powder; Baby shampoo; Baby wipes; Body lotion; Body lotions; Body wash; Cleaning agents and preparations; Detergents for household use; Dish detergents; Face creams; Laundry detergents; Laundry detergent; Lip balm; Lip balm; Lotions for face and body care; Moisturizing body lotions; Moisturizing creams; Moisturizing preparations for the skin; Moisturizing solutions for the skin; Shampoo-conditioners; Shampoos; Shampoos for babies; Skin cleansers; Skin cream; Skin and body topical lotions, creams and oils for cosmetic use; Skin cleansing cream; Skin creams; Skin creams in liquid and in solid form; Skin creams in liquid and solid form; Skin lotion; Skin lotions; Skin softeners; Tooth cleaning preparations; Tooth gel; Tooth paste; Tooth polishes; Tooth powder; Tooth powders; Cleaning agents for cleaning surfaces; Cleaning preparations for cleaning surfaces; Cloths or tissues impregnated with a skin cleanser; Face and body lotions; Hair shampoo; Hair shampoos and conditioners; Hand cleaning gels; Liquid laundry detergents; Non-medicated balms for use on skin; Non-medicated gel for teeth and gums; Non-medicated lip balms; Non-medicated lotions for body; Non-medicated lotions for skin; Non-medicated skin creams; Non-medicated skin care creams and lotions; Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, creams, lotions, gels, toners, cleaners and peels; Non-medicated diaper rash ointments and lotions; Non-medicated herbal body care products, namely, body oils, salves, and lip balms; Non-medicated preparations all for the care of skin, hair and scalp; Powder laundry detergents; Skin moisturizer; Skin moisturizing gel; Skin care preparations, namely, body balm; Skin cleanser in liquid spray form for use as a baby wipe alternative; Wipes impregnated with a skin cleanser; face moisturizersACTIVEJan 1, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 16, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 15, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 15, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 31, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 17, 2018MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance