USPTO serial 88030694
EDI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NOBLE, ANNIE MELISSA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EDI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel P. Mullarkey
DANIEL P. MULLARKEY POLSINELLI PC1401 EYE STREET, NW, SUITE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial services, namely, providing electronic transfer of a virtual currency for use by members of an on-line community via a global computer network; Financial services in the nature of providing portfolio management of financial assets and digital assets; providing financial transactions, namely, clearing and reconciling transactions, via global computer network; digital asset transactions, namely, digital currency exchange transaction services for transferrable electronic cash equivalent units having a specified cash value; currency exchange services, namely, transfer and exchange of virtual currencies for verifying smart contract data and economic development incentives | ACTIVE | Apr 26, 2019 |
| 042 | Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for encrypting data that provides a decentralized, mesh telecommunications and data storage network using blockchain technology; Design, development, and implementation of software solutions for digital currency security and transactions, namely, virtual currency and transactions involving smart contracts or virtual currency; Software as a services for generating cryptographic tokens that represent ownership of purchasable services or units of services; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and applications used to facilitate financial transactions that make use of blockchain technology, smart contracts and web services to create cryptographic tokens; design and development of computer software for use in online transactions and cryptographic trust infrastructures; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and applications used to facilitate submitting transactions, downloading transaction logs, and verifying transaction receipts in the field of digitized assets; platform as a service (PaaS) featuring blockchain-based computer software platforms for verifying digital information, codes and software for distributed computing platforms; Platform as a service (PaaS) featuring tax enterprise system blockchain-based computer platforms; Platform as a service (PaaS) featuring temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for verifying obligations of a smart contract and verifying economic development standards; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software and applications for enabling financial exchange services involving blockchain based technologies including cryptocurrency; software as a service for generating cryptocurrency tokens that represent ownership of economic development incentives, industry standards, and smart contracts | ACTIVE | Apr 26, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 8, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2019 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 2, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 1, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2019 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |