USPTO serial 88032476
5 DRAGONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 13, 2021
- Examiner
- RITTNER, HANNO I
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with 5 DRAGONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $325
Owner
Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd.
North Ryde, NSW, AU
Other trademarks owned by Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd.
Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd.
North Ryde, NSW, AU
Other trademarks owned by Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd.
Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd.
North Ryde, NSW, AU
Other trademarks owned by Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Zachary T. Gordon
Zachary T. Gordon ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.10220 Aristocrat WayLas Vegas, NV 89135United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game software for gambling machines; computer game software for gaming machines, namely, slot machines and video lottery terminals; games that accept virtual or monetary wagers sold as a feature of game software; downloadable computer software and firmware for playing games of chance on any computerized platform, including dedicated gaming consoles, video based slot machines, reel based slot machines, video lottery terminals, hand held devices, mobile and wireless communication devices, and internet enabled devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named 5 DRAGONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2026 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 13, 2026 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 22, 2026 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 13, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 26, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 6, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 13, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 12, 2020 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | ADBS | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Oct 2, 2020 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2020 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Sep 28, 2020 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Sep 28, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 23, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | 44EP | 44(e) PETITION - RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 30, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |