Drawing for FLIGHT BITES

USPTO serial 88036720

FLIGHT BITES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLIGHT BITES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carolyn S. Toto, Esq.

Carolyn S. Toto, Esq. PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP725 S. Figueroa Street, 36th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90017-5406UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Snack dips; potato crisps; cassava crisps; processed, seasoned and prepared nuts; snack mix consisting of processed seeds; pulse based snack foods and air dried sausages and beef jerkyACTIVE—
030Savoury biscuits; snack foods based on Corn kernels; popcorn; snack foods based on processed grains; sauces; food condiments consisting primarily of mayonnaise and spices; marinades; spices; spice rubs; mayonnaise; edible saltACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 18, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 11, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 11, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 22, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 20, 2021EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 20, 2021EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 20, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 9, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2020EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 7, 2020EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 7, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 23, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 21, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 21, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 21, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 13, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 11, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 11, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 16, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 27, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2019FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Mar 8, 2019ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Mar 1, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 25, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 16, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 15, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 28, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 28, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 28, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 6, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 18, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 2, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 18, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance