USPTO serial 88039866
SAN FRANCISCO AUTO MUSEUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5992806Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 18, 2020
- Examiner
- BETTS, MARCYA N
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SAN FRANCISCO AUTO MUSEUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA, US
San Francisco, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia L. Cotton
PATRICIA L. COTTON PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLPPO BOX 10500MCLEAN, VA 22102-8500UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Museum featuring automobiles and displays relating to automobiles; museum services, namely, providing information in the field of automobiles and automotive history; educational services, namely, providing displays and exhibits in the field of historic automobiles and automotive history, and providing educational courses in the field of automotive design and restoration | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 30, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2026 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 18, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 13, 2020 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2019 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 12, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 31, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 31, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |