USPTO serial 88039965
CONTEXT-AS-A-SERVICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARK, JENNY K
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONTEXT-AS-A-SERVICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lily Chow Calandra
109 Sears St.Toronto, Ontario, M4L0A2CanadaGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in curating and deploying context-aware services and content to mobile devices and to smart appliances, namely, household appliances that can be monitored and controlled by mobile devices; Computer software that allows users to access context-aware services and content on mobile devices and on smart appliances, namely, household appliances that can be monitored and controlled by mobile devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing a website and non-downloadable apps featuring technology that allows users to curate and deploy context-aware services and content to mobile devices and to smart appliances, namely, household appliances that can be monitored and controlled by mobile devices; Computer services, namely, providing a website and non-downloadable apps featuring technology that allows users to access context-aware services and content on mobile devices and on smart appliances, namely, household appliances that can be monitored and controlled by mobile devices; Cloud computing featuring non-downloadable software permitting users to curate, deploy, and access context-aware services and content; Platform as a Service featuring a computer software platform that allows context-aware services and content to be added to computer software programs and services; Consulting services in the field of cloud computing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 6, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 11, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2023 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 2, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 24, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |