USPTO serial 88046105
PFI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 28, 2020
- Examiner
- CHANG, ELIZABETH YI HSUAN
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with PFI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason H. Foster
Jason H. Foster Kremblas & Foster7632 Slate Ridge Blvd.Reynoldsburg, OH 43068United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal medicine vats, metal industrial storage tanks, metal catwalks, metal staircases, prefabricated metal elevated platforms, metal grain chutes and grain bins | ACTIVE | Jun 18, 2019 |
| 007 | Food processing machines comprised of conveyors and air cleaners; machine parts, namely, vibratory drives and horizontal motion drives for conveyors and shakers; vibratory separators; auger and screw conveyors; dough handling conveyors; dewatering vibratory conveyors; bulk box equipment, namely, dumpers and elevated dumpers; Product mix/blend systems comprising vibratory conveyors, horizontal motion conveyors, weighing equipment, hoppers, feeders, and portioning equipment; mechanical spreaders; mechanical shakers for separating solids; size length graders for food; vibratory conveyors; conveyor belts; mechanical gravity sorting machines and air sorting machines for foods; trimming machines for foods; sorting machines for handling and processing food products; equipment for use primarily in the dry food and chemical manufacturing and processing industries, namely, industrial conveyors, pulleys being part of the machines, food washing machines featuring wash tanks, bulk handling conveyors, conveying elevators, bucket elevators, vibratory tables being machines for the visual inspection of granular material, pneumatic separators, mechanical feeders being machine parts, mechanical discharging hoppers, feeder/hopper combinations being machine parts, power-operated continuous and batch extractors, power-operated nut meat piece breakers, spiral and ladder letdown chutes being parts of machines, machines in the nature of automatic edible nut crackers, machines in the nature of in-shell nut graders, machines in the nature of edible nut shellers, casebearer worm removal machines, vacuum tanks being parts of machines and vacuum pumps; horizontal or slide motion conveying, bucket elevator conveying, retracting/repositioning conveying machines, dough processing machines, kibbler machines for grinding and milling, guillotines being machines for food processing, curve conveying machines, namely, curved conveyor, curve belt conveyors, 90-degree conveyors, and 180-degree conveyors, spreaders being machines and sanitary conveying equipment, namely, spreading conveyors, chain spreaders or chain spreading conveyors, wire belt spreading conveyors; sorting machines for food and pharmaceutical products | ACTIVE | Jun 18, 2019 |
| 009 | Inspection machines for the physical inspection and weighing of food and pharmaceutical products; scanners for monitoring bulk articles moving past a monitoring station; scanners in the nature of high resolution cameras for monitoring product quality; inspection and sorting apparatus for imaging across conveyors, namely, scanners, computer hardware, computer software for operating sorting equipment; computer software for operating inspection equipment; and micro-processor based intelligent controllers for conveyors | ACTIVE | Jun 18, 2019 |
| 025 | Apparel, namely, shirts, t-shirts, long sleeve shirts, sweatshirts, pants, caps, hats, coats and jackets | ACTIVE | Jun 18, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Precision, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Precision, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by VANMARK EQUIPMENT, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Precision, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named PFI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2026 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2026 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 3, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 28, 2026 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 24, 2020 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2020 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 28, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2020 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 3, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 9, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 13, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |