Drawing for CHEZ MOI

USPTO serial 88050059

CHEZ MOI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DUBRAY, KATHERINE M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHEZ MOI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Victor K Sapphire, Esq.

Victor K Sapphire, Esq. LAW OFFICE OF VICTOR SAPPHIRE7190 SUNSET BLVD STE 116LOS ANGELES, CA 90046UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041entertainment services, namely, multimedia production services; entertainment services in the nature of live musical performances and production of sound recordings; entertainment services in the field of music, namely, conducting live performances by musicians and musical entertainers; record production services; entertainment services, namely, conducting live performances featuring music; production and distribution of music, films and radio shows; music video production services; entertainment services, namely, personal appearances by a celebrity; conducting entertainment exhibitions featuring live music performances; songwriting services for others for non-advertising purposes; fan club services; operating web sites in the fields of information about musical bands and performances, celebrities, and entertainmentACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 26, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 26, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 24, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 28, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jan 28, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 8, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Dec 26, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 23, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 11, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 11, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 11, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jun 11, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jun 11, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 11, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 21, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 20, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 20, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 19, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 27, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 27, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance