USPTO serial 88050547
GKD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEELEY, ALISON REBECCA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GKD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah J. Peckham
JOSEPH MARAIA BURNS & LEVINSON LLP125 High StreetBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | well stimulation and flow control products for use in the oil and gas industry, namely, metal piping, manifolds of metal for piping, metal pipe fittings, integral connections in the nature of metal pipe connectors, pup joints and hammer unions in the nature of high pressure metal pipe connectors; pressure control equipment for use in slickline and wireline operations in the oil and gas industry, namely, slickline and wireline pressure control strings, namely, hydraulic stuffing boxes being non-metal seals for lubricators and slicklines, pulleys of metal and non-metal; well stimulation and flow control products for use in the oil and gas industry, namely, pipe fittings in the nature of nonmetal pipe fittings, integral connections integral connections in the nature of metal integral union connections; parts and fittings for metal oil well pipes | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | well stimulation and flow control products for use in the oil and gas industry, namely, ball injectors in the nature of ball sealers, check valves in the nature of valves used to prevent backflow; tubing pup joints; pressure control equipment for use in slickline and wireline operations in the oil and gas industry, namely, pulleys in the nature of pulleys being parts of machines, lubricators in the nature of an assembly of pressure control equipment and tools for use in preparation for inserting or removing wireline tools from a well bore | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | well stimulation and flow control products for use in the oil and gas industry, namely, check valves in the nature of valves that prevent backflow in well service; Pressure control equipment for use in slickline and wireline operations in the oil and gas industry, namely, slickline and wireline pressure control strings, namely, wireline valves being blowout preventers, parts and fittings for pressure relief valves being parts of blowout preventers | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Manufacturing, namely, namely, custom manufacturing of oil well stimulation and flow control products; machining, namely, machine shop services, namely, machining parts for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GKD Industries Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named GKD
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |