USPTO serial 88051688
ARTIIFACT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARTIIFACT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles J. Meyer
Charles J. Meyer Woodard, Emhardt, Henry, Reeves & Wagner, LLP111 Monument Circle, Suite 3700Indianapolis, IN 46204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | (Based on Intent to Use) Cases adapted for holding watches; Works of art of precious metal; Jewellery cases; Presentation boxes for watches(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Cases adapted for holding watches; Works of art of precious metal; Jewellery cases; Presentation boxes for watches | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | (Based on Intent to Use) Cabinets; Cabinets for display purposes; Works of art made of wood(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Cabinets; Cabinets for display purposes; Works of art made of wood | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | (Based on Intent to Use) Bowls; Candle holders; Cheese board and knife set; Coasters, not of paper or textile; Containers for ice; Cutting boards; Serving trays; Wine buckets; Wine openers; Wine bottle cradles; Cooling buckets for wine; Leather coasters(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Bowls; Candle holders; Cheese board and knife set; Coasters, not of paper or textile; Containers for ice; Cutting boards; Serving trays; Wine buckets; Wine openers; Wine bottle cradles; Cooling buckets for wine; Leather coasters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 8, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |