USPTO serial 88051903
MODL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GADSON, SHARI B.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MODL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heather S. Stutz (Wisconsin bar member)
HEATHER S. STUTZ (WISCONSIN BAR MEMBER) QUARLES & BRADY LLP411 EAST WISCONSIN AVENUE, SUITE 2400MILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic controllers for the control of electric lighting systems, and components in the nature of touchscreens, wall stations, modular control electronics, dimming and control enclosures; software for operating or controlling electric lighting systems; network components and software for lighting systems, and audio and video electronic controllers for lighting systems; electric lighting control systems featuring wired network communications devices and network bridge devices between wired and wireless components or systems, comprising of electric light dimmers, electric light dimmer racks, electric light dimmer controls, electric relays, electric relay racks, and electric relay controls, and computer software for operating electric light dimming systems having components that communicate wired or wirelessly or create bridges between wired and wireless systems sold as a unit; electronic control apparatus for hoists that provide controllable lifting in theaters, arenas, stages and manufacturing; media content communications server hardware and computer software for controlling and managing access server applications for media content | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |