USPTO serial 88053598
TRU-TEMP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SIMCOX, KYLE DUNCAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRU-TEMP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TOD R. NISSLE
TOD R. NISSLE TOD R. NISSLE, P.C.PO BOX 55630PHOENIX, AZ 85078UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Bottles, sold empty; Flasks; Growlers; Drinking flasks; Empty water bottles for bicycles; Hip flasks; Insulated flasks; Insulated vacuum flasks; Reusable stainless steel water bottles sold empty; Shaker bottles sold empty; Sports bottles sold empty; Vacuum flasks; Vacuum bottles; Water bottles sold empty | ACTIVE | Jul 8, 2019 |
| 035 | On-line retail store services featuring metal bottle caps, insulated metal bottle caps, insulated vacuum metal bottle caps, metal lids, insulated metal lids, and insulated vacuum metal lids, and metal lids, insulated metal lids, and insulated vacuum metal lids for flasks, drinking flasks, bottles sold empty, flasks for food and growlers, and for insulated and insulated vacuum flasks, drinking flasks, bottles sold empty, flasks for food and growlers, and for insulated and insulated vacuum flasks, drinking flasks, insulated vacuum flasks, insulated drinking flasks, insulated vacuum drinking flasks, insulated bottles sold empty, insulated vacuum bottles sold empty, insulated flasks for food, insulated vacuum flasks for food, insulated growlers, insulated vacuum growlers, reusable stainless steel flasks, drinking flasks, bottles sold empty, flasks, insulated containers for food and beverage for cosmetic use, namely, flasks for food, thermal insulated bottles sold empty, flasks, growlers, and flasks for food, drinking flasks for travelers, drinking vessels, bottles having mouthpieces sold empty, coffee and tea mugs, beer and pint drinking glasses, insulated beer and pint drinking glasses, insulated vacuum beer and pint drinking glasses, reusable stainless steel beer and pint drinking glasses, and thermal insulated beer and pint drinking glasses | ACTIVE | Jul 8, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GLOBAL HOME IMPORTS, INC
- Other trademarks owned by GLOBAL HOME IMPORTS, INC
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named TRU-TEMP
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2019 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 20, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 7, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 25, 2019 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 16, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 9, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 5, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |