USPTO serial 88055697
C
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with C?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montréal, Québec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ellen A. Andelman
Ellen A. Andelman Moore & Van Allen PLLC100 North Tryon StreetSuite 4700Charlotte, NC 28202-4003Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Interactive computer software and mobile application for the capturing, processing, transmitting, broadcasting, and displaying of 2d animation, 3d animation, cinematography, broadcast graphics, and virtual reality and augmented reality worlds, interfaces and environments in both real time and pre-recorded playback; Interactive computer software and mobile application that enables image capture, motion capture, image processing, image rendering, image visualization, data processing, data conversion and conversion of 2d video into 3d animation; Interactive computer software and mobile application that generates connections linking programs for the processing, rendering, and management of computer-generated imagery; Interactive computer software and mobile application that provides connectivity, interoperability and management capability among networked components and systems for the processing, rendering, and management of computer-generated imagery | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (saas) provider in the field of creating, managing, capturing, processing, transmitting, broadcasting, and displaying of 2d animation, 3d animation, cinematography, broadcast graphics, and virtual reality and augmented reality worlds, interfaces and environments in the entertainment, automotive, retail, and property and personal security industries; Software as a service (saas) provider featuring software that enables image capture, motion capture, image processing, image rendering, image visualization, data processing, data conversion and conversion of 2d video into 3d animation in the entertainment, automotive, retail, and property and personal security industries; Maintenance and updating of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 21, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 10, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |